Authors
Fiyinfolu Balogun, Mirella Altoe, Catherine O'Connor, Nobel Chowdhury, Andrea Cercek, Choong-kun Lee, Michael Bonner Foote, Daehee Kim, Steven Brad Maron, Dae Won Kim, Karyn Ronski, Joon Oh Park, Calvin Y. Chao, Yelena Y. Janjigian, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Luis A. Diaz, Eileen Mary O'Reilly, Francisco Sanchez-Vega, Debyani Chakravarty, Wungki Park
Background:Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) results in MSI-H state and is the first tumor type-agnostic biomarker predictive of ICI response. Among GI cancers, MSI-H is most frequent in colorectal cancer (CRC 15%), gastroesophageal (GEC, 5%) and other (small bowel, hepatopancreatobiliary; 1%). For CRC, MSI-H can be attributed to germline mutation (Lynch syndrome, 3%) or somatic inactivation (sporadic, 12%) of foundational MMR genes. Studies evaluating ICI efficacy in dMMR cancers focus primarily on non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (pts). We present prevalence, tumor genomic features, and outcomes in pts from a large cohort at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK).
Methods:Retrospective analysis of MSI-H GI cancers from MSK-IMPACT database. Pts were grouped by self-reported race and ethnicity into 4 study arms: NHW, Asian, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic. Age, tumor type, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and MMR genes were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) estimated with Kaplan-Meier.
Results:Of 776 pts with MSI-H GI cancers: 623 (80.3 %) NHW, 60 (7.7 %) Hispanic, 50 Asian (6.5 %), and 43 (5.5 %) NHB. CRC (76%), GEC (14%), other cancers (10%). We present initial evaluation of CRC and GEC: Median age, TMB, and most frequently altered MMR genes (MMR gene FA) are in table. Median OS (mOS) in NHW/URM by receipt of ICI in MSI-H CRC were 38.5m/25.3m (p 0.07) in no-ICI group, 34.2m/28.7m (p 0.64) in +ICI group; MSI-H GEC 43.4m/30m (p 0.44) in no-ICI group, 28.8m/26.7m in +ICI group.
Conclusions:Number of URM MSI-H CRC/GEC pts is 7 to 15-fold less than NHW, with no such difference in % MSI-H/MSS between groups; reflecting significant undertesting in URM pts. In MSI-H CRC, median age (m-Age) at sequencing was younger in URM compared to NHW; pronounced in Asian and Hispanic patients, who were 10+ years younger than NHW. No such age difference seen in GEC. No difference in mOS detected between NHW and URM, however a non-significant trend towards worse mOS in URM was observed in the no-ICI group. Next steps include validation of clinico-genomics of MSI-H GI cancers in other large cohorts, including TEMPUS (N = 768) which is ongoing.
|
NHW | CRC |
NHB | CRC |
Asian | CRC |
Hispanic | CRC |
MSI-H/MSS % (MSI-H, N) |
13% (3679) |
10% (349) |
8% (430) |
14% (331) |
m-Age |range (p vs NHW) |
67 | 19-60 (1) |
61 | 28-78 (0.025) |
57 | 26-89 (0.023) |
55 | 25-87 (0.048) |
m-TMB | range (p vs NHW) |
58 | 3-369 (1) |
54 | 21-201 (0.43) |
50 | 26-219 (0.06) |
61 | 32-400 (0.95) |
MMR gene FA (% | N) |
MSH6 (27% | 492) |
MLH1 (26% | 34) |
MSH2 (26% | 34) |
MSH6 (36% | 45) |
|
NHW | GEC |
NHB | GEC |
Asian | GEC |
Hispanic | GEC |
MSI-H/MSS % (MSI-H, N) |
5% (1314) |
7% (83) |
5% (184) |
7% (124) |
m-Age |range (p vs NHW) |
71 | 45-90 (1) |
70 | 55-81 (0.3) |
68 | 49-85 (0.55) |
68 | 35-88 (0.53) |
m-TMB | range (p vs NHW) |
50 | 2-172 (1) |
75 | 30-87 (0.34) |
49 | 18-72 (0.59) |
44 | 31-62 (0.3) |
MMR gene FA (% | N) |
MSH6/MLH1 (13% | 76) |
MLH1 (33% | 6) |
MSH6 (30% | 10) |
MSH2/MSH6 (11% | 9) |
VIEW THE PUBLICATION
VIEW THE POSTER